
IN 2016 PALANTIR, an American software firm, successfully sued(起诉) the US Army to win a second chance at a contract. A decade on, the fortunes of the company seeded by the CIA’s venture arm, and named after an all-seeing stone in J.R.R. Tolkien’s fantasy epic “The Lord of the Rings”, have changed. Business is booming (see chart). Domestic revenue has more than doubled in a year, to $1.6bn in the second quarter of 2026. The American government accounts for two-fifths of its global business. Despite concerns that AI might eat its lunch(抢走生意), American firms think its software can provide a layer of protection for their raw data, a privacy shield against frontier(前沿的) AI labs like OpenAI and Anthropic.
2016年,美国软件公司帕兰提尔成功起诉美国陆军,赢得了合同的第二次机会。十年后,这家由中情局风险投资部门孵化、以J.R.R.托尔金奇幻史诗《指环王》中无所不见的石头命名的公司,命运已然改变。业务蒸蒸日上(见图表)。国内收入一年内翻了一倍多,2026年第二季度达到16亿美元。美国政府占其全球业务的三分之二。尽管有人担心人工智能会抢走它的生意,美国公司认为其软件能为原始数据提供一层保护,成为抵御OpenAI和Anthropic等前沿AI实验室的隐私盾牌。
“I’m struggling with our current popularity,” joked Alex Karp, Palantir’s CEO, on a recent earnings call. If Mr Karp, who once served on the board of The Economist’s parent company, is feeling too comfy, he need only look across the Atlantic.(如果卡普先生觉得太安逸,只需看看大西洋彼岸。)
“我们目前太受欢迎,让我有点不知所措,”帕兰提尔首席执行官亚历克斯·卡普在最近一次财报电话会议上开玩笑说。如果卡普先生——他曾担任《经济学人》母公司的董事——觉得太舒服了,他只需看看大西洋彼岸。

In July French and German security chiefs announced they would replace a “digital backbone(数字骨干)” reliant on Palantir with European alternatives. In Britain, its biggest foreign market, and home to a sixth of its workforce, MPs have urged(敦促) Andy Burnham, the prime minister, to exercise a break clause(终止条款) in February in a seven-year contract with the National Health Service. Palantir is suing Sir Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, after he blocked a deal with the Metropolitan Police claiming competition processes were circumvented(被规避).
7月,法国和德国安全部门负责人宣布,他们将用欧洲的替代方案取代依赖帕兰提尔的“数字骨干”。在英国——其最大的海外市场,也是其六分之一员工的家园——议员们敦促首相安迪·伯纳姆在2月行使与国民健康服务体系(NHS)七年合同中的终止条款。帕兰提尔正在起诉伦敦市长萨迪克·汗爵士,因为他以竞争程序被规避为由,阻止了与伦敦警察厅的交易。
Too good to be true?
好得难以置信?
The alternatives are worse
替代方案更糟