The question of how to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) has acquainted strange bedfellows(奇怪的盟友), but few odder than Jensen Huang, the billionaire boss of Nvidia, and Lina Khan, a left-wing trustbuster(反垄断斗士) who served as Joe Biden’s chair of the Federal Trade Commission. As debate over restrain(限制，约束)ing large language models (LLMs) becomes more frenzied(疯狂的，狂热的), both Mr Huang and Ms Khan maintain(坚持认为，主张) that rules already on the books(已生效的，法律明文规定的) can deal with most risks. Existing law is sufficient(足够的，充分的), Mr Huang maintained recently. “Apply it.”
如何监管人工智能（AI）这个问题，让一些意想不到的人走到了一起，但其中最奇怪的组合莫过于英伟达的亿万富翁老板黄仁勋和左翼反垄断斗士莉娜·汗——她曾在拜登政府中担任联邦贸易委员会主席。随着围绕限制大语言模型（LLM）的辩论日益激烈，黄仁勋和汗都坚持认为，现有法律足以应对大多数风险。黄仁勋最近表示，现行法律已经足够，“执行就是了”。
It may not be that simple. The question of how current laws govern(管辖，适用于) AI is already the subject of copious(大量的，丰富的) litigation(诉讼), as courts hear arguments over whether chatbots have harmed Americans or facilitate(协助，促进)d crimes. However, it may take years to decide such cases, let alone(更不用说) to use those cases to establish reliable standards. Even then, liability(责任，法律责任) suits mainly deal with harm only after it has occurred.
事情可能没那么简单。现行法律如何管辖AI，已经成为大量诉讼的主题，法院正在审理聊天机器人是否伤害了美国人或协助了犯罪的争论。然而，这类案件可能需要数年才能判决，更不用说用这些案件来确立可靠的标准了。即便到了那时，责任诉讼也主要是在损害发生之后才进行处理。
Both civil and criminal law can apply to cases involving models. Civil tort(民事侵权行为)s such as product liability and libel(诽谤（书面）) come with(伴随，附带) financial penalties. Crimes such as hacking carry potential prison time. But using either legal avenue(途径，手段) is not straightforward(简单明了的，直接的).
民事法和刑事法都可以适用于涉及模型的案件。产品责任和诽谤等民事侵权行为会带来经济处罚。黑客攻击等犯罪行为则可能面临监禁。但无论走哪条法律途径，都并非易事。