The law is clear, says Prof Jeannie Paterson. “If I deploy(部署，投入使用) an AI agent and it causes harm to someone else, I am responsible for(对……负责) that harm.
珍妮·帕特森教授表示，法律是明确的。“如果我部署了一个AI代理，而它给他人造成了伤害，我就要为那个伤害负责。
“Even if I didn’t intend for that to happen, it was foreseeable(可预见的), and I should be taking responsibility.”
“即使我并非有意让那件事发生，但它是可预见的，我应当承担责任。”
However, the director of the University of Melbourne’s Centre for AI and Digital Ethics acknowledges there is also a good deal of scope for legal and ethical “murkiness” around actions perpetrated by automated agents, after Australia’s first known agentic AI “accident”.(然而，墨尔本大学AI伦理中心主任承认，在澳大利亚首起AI事故后，法律和道德上仍有很大模糊空间。)
然而，墨尔本大学人工智能与数字伦理中心主任承认，在澳大利亚首起已知的智能体AI“事故”之后，围绕自动化代理所实施的行为，法律和道德上仍有很大的“模糊”空间。
Legal ambiguity
法律模糊性