On Monday, the three news organizations that had been kicked out of the White House because of Donald Trump’s latest fit of pique sued the president and three top advisers.(周一，因唐纳德·特朗普最新一轮闹脾气而被逐出白宫的三家新闻机构，对总统及三名高级顾问提起了诉讼。)
周一，因唐纳德·特朗普最新一轮闹脾气而被逐出白宫的三家新闻机构，对总统及三名高级顾问提起了诉讼。
An accompanying statement by CNN, MS Now and Politico accurately calls last week’s sudden lockout(封杀；禁止进入) “a direct assault on(对……的直接攻击) the first amendment”.
CNN、MS Now和Politico随诉讼发布的一份声明准确地将上周突如其来的封杀称为“对第一修正案的直接攻击”。
The legal action is the right move, of course, and one that may prevail since the ban seems to be a clear case of what press-rights lawyers call “viewpoint discrimination”.(法律行动当然是正确的举措，而且可能胜诉，因为这一禁令似乎正是新闻权利律师所说的“观点歧视”的明显案例。) In other words, Trump didn’t like their stories so he removed their access.
法律行动当然是正确的举措，而且可能胜诉，因为这一禁令似乎正是新闻权利律师所说的“观点歧视”的明显案例。换句话说，特朗普不喜欢他们的报道，于是取消了他们的采访资格。