Should you be able to take money out of your super(养老金) to pay for housing? One Nation(澳大利亚右翼政党) has recently suggested you should. Liberal senator Andrew Bragg has also revived(重新提出) the idea. The treasurer, Jim Chalmers, tells us the Coalition and One Nation are “coming after(追逐、攻击) super” and want to “vandalise(破坏、肆意损毁)” the retirement savings scheme. He also predicts the next federal election will be a referendum(全民公投) on super.
你应该能够从养老金中取钱来支付住房费用吗？一国党最近提出应该可以。自由党参议员安德鲁·布拉格也重新提出了这一想法。财政部长吉姆·查默斯告诉我们，联盟党和一国党正在“追逐养老金”，想要“破坏”退休储蓄计划。他还预测，下一届联邦选举将成为一场关于养老金的全民公投。
In the midst of(在……之中) a national cost of living crisis and housing shortage, it would seem reasonable to ask about the balance between how much money we are saving for retirement and how much money we have to use now. It would also seem uncontroversial(无可争议的) to discuss whether altering(改变) that balance will assist with cost-of-living pressures or add to them.
在全国生活成本危机和住房短缺的背景下，询问我们在退休储蓄和当下可用资金之间如何平衡，似乎是合理的。讨论改变这种平衡是会缓解还是加剧生活成本压力，似乎也无可争议。
The idea of using super for housing is hotly contested(激烈争议的).
动用养老金购房的想法引发了激烈争议。